COMMUNISM

There is no such thing as Communism

No nation’s people in the 20th century ever decided to become a communist nation because that was deemed a new and wonderful way to order society.

Looking back on early Communist Russia and China, we awkwardly acknowledge that immense cruelties were exercised by Lenin and Mao, but we probably never suspect that behind-the-scenes Wall Street billionaires were orchestrating events. I didn’t learn about this until I turned 58. It’s counterintuitive until it’s explained to you.

The foregoing current definition is a longstanding fiction, from a history written by the victors. The 1913 Webster dictionary delivered the same party line:

“Communism: A scheme of equalizing the social conditions of life; specifically, a scheme which contemplates the abolition of inequalities in the possession of property, as by distributing all wealth equally to all, or by holding all wealth in common for the equal use and advantage of all.”

Let’s hear William T. Still hint at what really happened, from his informative video documentary “The Money Masters”.

The Money Changers never forgave the tsars for their support of Lincoln during the civil war.
Also, Russia was the last major European nation to refuse to give into the privately owned central bank scheme.

Jacob Schiff from Kuhn, Loeb & Company bragged from his deathbed that he gave $20 million towards the defeat of the tsar.

Researcher Gary Allen explained it this way: "If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs ... Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite."
The master planners attempted to control revolutionist communist group by feeding them vast quantities of money when they obeyed, and contracted supply or even financed their opposition if they got out of control.

Lenin began to understand that although he was the absolute dictator of the new Soviet Union, he was not pulling the financial strings. Someone else was silently in control: "The state does not function as we desired. The car does not obey. A man is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the desired direction. It moves as another force wishes."

(and)

"Mr. Bakhmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to the United States, tells us that the Bolsheviks, after victory, transferred 600 million roubles in gold between the years 1918 and 1922 to Kuhn, Loeb & Company (Jacob Schiff's firm)." [Gary Allen again]

I think we can now view the following posters for what they are: cynical propaganda. The tale of the class struggle, the rise of the proletariat, the redefining of economic dynamics, were all theater designed to deflect attention from theft and control.

The LIE that is “Marxism” has been masterfully unraveled by Miles Mathis in his essay about Marx. Wikipedia states, “Due to his political publications, Marx became stateless and lived in exile with his wife and children in London for decades…” Actually, his mother came from wealth and his wife was a baroness, so London was simply the posh setting they preferred. He probably didn’t even write Das Kapital (my opinion), which is famous for being not read by anyone because it’s rubbish. Miles exposes that Marxism was a bogus ideology concocted to distract from a genuine socialist movement which was worrying the ultra-rich.

Another sign of subterfuge in the Bolshevik Revolution is that many of the top operatives in the new government structure were not even Russians and they changed their names to hide the fact:

Five other tipoffs come to mind:

>The Holodomor (1932-1933), when Stalin starved the kulaks in the Ukraine: the architect of this genocide was Henry Wallace, then US Sec. of Agriculture and later VP under FDR. Stalin bought him a 30,000 acre ranch in [Wyoming or Montana] for his service. The kulaks’ only offense was they were independent farmers, and independence is anathema to tyranny.

>When Mao Tse-tung was battling Chiang Kai-shek for control of China, US general George Marshall orchestrated more than one betrayal of Chiang’s forces, by diverting military arms, in a successful effort to have China become a Communist nation.

>During the Viet Nam “war” numerous US corporations helped upgrade the gigantic Kama River truck factory in Russia. Some of these trucks were used in opposition to US forces.

>Even worse, during the Korean and Viet Nam “wars” the Under-Secretary of the Security Council of the United Nations was a Russian general, and privy to all activities of the US forces. This office was occupied contiguously by 13 Russians from 1946-1988.

>During the “Cold War” with Soviet Russia, US and Russian biowarfare scientists collaborated in their research with each other.

This is Maxim Litvinov (real surname Polyansky) He was a high functionary in Soviet Russia during all of Stalin’s reign. Stalin was famous for murdering vast numbers, but especially many of those once deemed allies and confidantes. Somehow Litvinov made it through all that, serving in various stated capacities. In my opinion he was a key liaison to the international bankers.

This arrangement would be similar to that of Bernard Baruch, a behind the scenes power broker in the US for years. Anecdote: When Churchill came to the US after WW2 to see the President, he first stopped in NYC to consult with Baruch. Also, he was famous for meeting important government people on a park bench near the White House to secretly share intrigues beyond the hearing range of anyone else. The US Park Service has made a little memorial out of this bench in honor of his “service to the country”. Typical.

So, if there’s no such thing as Communism, what is it? How about HOMICIDAL PARASITISM? Governments leach the vitality out of their citizens, and murder with impunity. The Covid Era has taught us about murder in spades. Here in the US at least 40% of a common person’s earnings go to a dizzying array of taxes.

What about when we joke about our state or county or city being communist, and calling it “the people’s republic of…”? Usually, we are bemoaning intrusive regulations. Let’s call that BUTTINSKYISM.

Well, let’s wind this up. This is an excerpt from an excellent essay from 2009 found at Global Research.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/

GR has excellent writers and helpful information.

This portion is actually excerpting from Anthony C. Sutton’s “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution”. This is a famous and seminal work on this topic and can be found online.

Sutton wrote many shocking books and was associated with The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. This institution is a creature of the cabal, so that makes Sutton an Agent, which makes his books partial hangout, which means the bottom truth is even worse than this hairball mess shown below.

Did you know that Herbert Hoover helped prolong WW1 by managing the Belgian Relief organization which was said to be supplying food to the occupied Belgians, but it actually went to Germany which was on the verge of capitulating due to starvation. The billionaires who sold armaments were not done making their profits.

Origins of the American Empire: Revolution, World Wars and World Order

Global Power and Global Government: Part 2

By Andrew Gavin Marshall

Global Research, July 28, 2009

[the following excerpt appx. 1000 words of appx. 6900]

Antony C. Sutton, economist, historian and author, as well as research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, wrote in Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, that both fascist and communist systems are “based on naked, unfettered political power and individual coercion. Both systems require monopoly control of society. While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to ‘go political’ and make society go to work for the monopolists,” and that, “the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market for monopoly capitalists, if an alliance can be made with the socialist powerbrokers.”[15] Thus, the major money powers of the west decided to put their money behind the creation of a totalitarian communist state in Russia, in order to create a captive economy, which they could exploit and remove from competititon.

When the Revolution began, Trotsky was in New York, and was immediately granted an American passport by President Wilson, and then given a Russian entry permit and a British transit visa, in order to return to Russia and “carry forward” the revolution.[16] Trotsky, while traveling, was arrested in Canada, but was released as a result of British intervention.[17]

Trotsky traveled on board a ship in 1917, leaving New York, along with an interesting cast of fellow passengers, including “other Trotskyite revolutionaries, Wall Street financiers, American Communists, and a man named Charles Crane. Charles Richard Crane, former chairman of the Democratic Party’s finance committee, whose son, Richard Crane, was an assistant to U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing, played a significant part in what occurred in Russia. Former U.S. Ambassador to Germany, William Dodd, said that Crane, “did much to bring on the [Alexander] Kerensky revolution which gave way to Communism.” Kerensky was the second Prime Minister in the Russian Provisional Government, which followed the collapse of the Czarist government, and preceded the Bolshevik. Crane also thought that the Kerensky government “is the revolution in its first phase only.”[18]

The Revolution occurred in the midst of World War I, which broke out in 1914, and had all the major European powers at war. Morgan and Rockefeller interests, organized in Wall Street and centralized in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the most powerful of all the regional Federal Reserve Banks, used “the Red Cross Mission as its operational vehicle” in Russia at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution. The Red Cross Mission in Russia got its endowment from wealthy people such as J.P. Morgan, Mrs. E. H. Harriman, Cleveland H. Dodge, and Mrs. Russell Sage, and “in World War I the Red Cross depended heavily on Wall Street, and specifically the Morgan firm.” When the American Red Cross set up a mission to Russia, “William Boyce Thompson, director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, had ‘offered to pay the entire expense of the commission’.”[19] All expenses were paid for by William Boyce Thompson, who was a major stockholder in Chase National Bank, whose President had Thompson appointed head of the New York Fed.[20]

The Mission was primarily made up of lawyers, financiers, their assistants, people affiliated with Standard Oil and the Rockefeller’s National City Bank.[21] The Mission supported through a loan, the Provisional government of Alexander Kerensky, yet, William B. Thompson of the New York Fed “made a personal contribution of $1,000,000 to the Bolsheviki for the purpose of spreading their doctrine in Germany and Austria.” Interestingly, when the Bolsheviks took control, “The National City Bank branch in Petrograd had been exempted from the Bolshevik nationalization decree – the only foreign or domestic Russian bank to have been so exempted.”[22] Ultimately, the Red Cross mission in Russia “was in fact a mission of Wall Street financiers to influence and pave the way for control, through either Kerensky or the Bolshevik revolutionaries, of the Russian market and resources.”[23]

The American International Corporation (AIC), was “created in 1915 to develop domestic and foreign enterprises, to extend American activities abroad, and to promote the interests of American and foreign bankers, business and engineering.” It was created and controlled by Morgan, Stillman and Rockefeller interests, and its directors were affiliated with National City Bank (Rockefeller), the Carnegie Foundation, General Electric, the DuPont family, New York Life Insurance, American Bankers Association and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Members of its board financially supported the Bolsheviks and urged the US State Department to recognize the Bolshevik government.[24]

In 1920, Russian gold was being siphoned through Sweden, where it was melted down and stamped with the Swedish mint, funneled through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and into Kuhn, Loeb & Company and Guaranty Trust Company (Morgan), two of the primary banking interests behind the creation of the Federal Reserve System. [25] During the civil war in Russia between the Reds and the Whites, while Wall Street financiers were aiding the Bolsheviks quietly, they also began to finance Aleksandr Kolchak (of the Whites) with millions of dollars, in order to ensure that whoever emerged victorious in the war, Wall Street would win.[26]

As Antony Sutton wrote, “Russia, then and now, constituted the greatest potential competitive threat to American industrial and financial supremacy,” and that, “The gigantic Russian market was to be converted into a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control.”[27]

Eventually, the Bolsheviks emerged victorious, and Wall Street won. Under Stalin’s Five-Year Plans in the early 1930s, Soviet industrialization “required Western technology and expertise,” and in a “frequently overlooked contribution” that came “from abroad,” American firms aided in the industrialization of the USSR, including Ford, General Electric and DuPont,[28] with Standard Oil, General Electric, Austin Co., General Motors, International Harvester, and Caterpillar Tractor trading heavily with the Soviet Union.[29]

Standard Oil bought “gargantuan quantities of Red Oil,” General Electric received a $100,000,000 contract from the Soviet Union to build “the four largest hydroelectric generators in the world,” Austin Co., got a $50,000,000 contract to erect the City of Austingrad, “complete with tractor and automobile factories involving an additional $30,000,000 contract for parts and technical assistance with Ford Motor Corp.” On top of this, “Other [Soviet] business friends are General Motors, DuPont de Nemours, International Harvester, John Deere Co., Caterpillar Tractor, Radio Corp. and the U. S. Shipping Board, which sold the Reds a fleet of 25 cargo steamers.” Banks with close ties to the Russian economy included Chase National, National City Bank and Equitable Trust, all of which are either Rockefeller or Morgan interests.[30]

[15]      Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. Buccaneer Books, New York, 1974: pages 16-17

[16]      Antony C. Sutton, ibid., 1974: page 25

[17]      Antony C. Sutton, ibid., 1974: page 34

[18]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 25-26

[19]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 71-73

[20]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 89-90

[21]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 73-77

[22]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 82-83

[23]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: page 87

[24]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 127-135

[25]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 159-161

[26]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 166-167

[27]      Antony C. Sutton, Ibid., 1974: pages 172-173

[28]      Michael Kort, The Soviet Colossus: History and Aftermath. M.E. Sharpe, 2001: page 202

[29]      Time, Russia & Recognition. Time Magazine: August 18, 1930: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,789203,00.html

[30]      Time, Everybody’s Red Business. Time Magazine: June 9, 1930: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,739474-5,00.html